You know those absurd and surreal speeches to which we are used now?
The tragic thing is that some slogans or some TECHNIQUES OF TELEVISION defense of the indefensible then find the speeches of people . The damage is irreversible fear! Here's an example: The
vigilant Berlusconi "She 'went with Red. I must do fine."
- Santanchè: "He also made the left!"
- Sallusti: "Pero 'too vigilant in 1984, scooter ..."
- Capezzone: "Enough of these sad brigade left!"
- Cicchitto: "She has the consent of the Italians to govern!"
- Ferrara 'C' is perseverance. The policeman was stationed there for days. Puritan and voyeur! "
- Bondi "The left is only capable of hating and fine! We are the ones dell'ammore"
- Ostellino: "I focus on the semaphore. It 's the presence of so many red flags that should worry a true liberal "
- Wolves: "We Catholics forgive the sinners, not fined, the limit bid (and besides the ICI has taken the church)!"
- Cruciani (to Radio24): "Past with Red? Mica shock me I Do not m'indigno!"
- Minzolini: "Who?" Did something happen? Now on a grooming service for dogs, as the hair is in fashion in 2011. "
- Bagnasco (CEI): "He called on all parties, including firefighters, a pipe guide that gives top priority to human values \u200b\u200b."... "PS: Many thanks to the ICI."
you think that in the real world to you any of these justifications can avoid a fine? Yet on television work and how, and you find yourself in the speeches of the people!
And they do it all now, even if the true masters of this art, to be recognized are those of the Centre Right.
To tell the truth even in a televised debate these ideas may be ridiculed in 5 seconds (if the other side there were at least capable actors). Fact:
- the type 1 is basically an admission of guilt. One thing wrong is that even if the others do.
- That type 2 is often Neuro, but it works! Of course, you throw mud to show that perhaps the agent has done mischief. Of course, what moves it is not desire for justice, but to persuade that "they are all corrupt" and discharge all (invced to condemn them all).
- It buckles a political agent, and that's it. Generically, without evidence. The judge and condemn me if a communist 'but a "right" if he performs. Impeccable. The four
- is destroyed with a "What the hell what?". It governs the extent permitted by laws and constitution, wisdom ' you go to jail!
- balls to change the subject.
- thesis very ridiculous, very young, which is a spur with the declarations foaming at the mouth before or after.
- Oh yes, our all'Amatriciana Liberals!
- Sadly true!
- A narcissus success. Indignation on the right things helps to keep the place (Santalmassi docet)!
- all laugh!
- Sadly true!