It 'pretty clear that Felt attacks to target those who agree with him and his boss!
But the thing I find ridiculous, and 'the fact that he tries to defend his head from a charge (eg the very shameful to give the impression to appoint ministers to spare processes, see Brancher) trying to prove that the 'accuser misbehaves. And he writes clearly.
And even if it was that shit about defense and '?
All = all innocent guilty? But where?
Actually ' it works very well in Italy and by the way this technique 'most effective in changing the subject.
Cosi 'everybody talks about for weeks atro.
In practice, for example, if Tizio Caio accusation in detail to be pedophiles and they can 'meet accusing him of double parking (or at least to be a pedophile too). According to Felt that is enough to leave around the Pedophile, and maybe even the parking undisciplined (not both be punished)!
In short, more 'to refute the accusation on the merits, tends only to show that those who accuse "lacks the dignity' morale to do to close the matter, sending contenpo avveritimento to a mafia-like "an eye that the speaker dies!")
We know that every country has the Masters that you deserve!
0 comments:
Post a Comment