This is a document of sale of securities of the Argentine Deutsche Bank As you can see the date of purchase is repeated three times (25 Jan. 2001) (The default is the end of 2001)
The birth of the title is 5 DAYS AFTER : 30 Jan. 2001come Argentina continued to see the issue ...... but, as in this case, before there seems to be assured that the stock had already sold to investors and then going around is issued (if to believe the courts of Milan) the obligation of the prospectus and other warranties (ask lawyer ) which belong to the offering circular risparmiatori.Ricordate reserved invest.istituz to these emissions. (banche.. etc.), sale to the "small" customers (so-called retail). In the legal process Banks often complain that customers have decided themselves to purchase. This (perhaps) in order not to have led to criticism for the purchase and given themselves the title to the investor (with all the duties of informa. adequacy, etc.. .) deriverebbero.ma that in cases like (gray market) reported here, and there are many, we must ask "HOW COULD YOU KNOW AND THE EXISTENCE OF AN unborn?" Is it not plausible DEDUCTIBLE correct to imagine that it was the bank (even here placements Responsible Argentina) to offer? Blessed be the decision of the judges in Milan (cited http://asandabubia3.blogspot.com/ el blog). If you're in this situation and you have not signed nor knowledge of the conflict of interest or anything, ask your lawyers.
